About

I read a lot. I write a lot.
Subsequently, I think a lot about what I read & write
Now these notes are going live on the world wide web.
I like to think of it as 'plunging' the cr** out of news media, gathering facts and making occassional predictions (that are correct 97.8% of the time)

» "[Cornell] Study links warm offices to fewer typing errors and higher productivity..." they're just bitter because they're cold up there in NY!

“Study links warm offices to fewer typing errors and higher productivity”… I don’t believe it! Arctic temperatures make me crazy productive! and by arctic I mean 65-69 degrees!

According to the daily stat’s synopsis of this Cornell study:

JULY 15, 2010

Chilly Offices Limit Productivity

Raising the temperature of an insurance company’s offices from 68 degrees to 77 degrees Fahrenheit (20 to 25 C) reduced typing errors by 44% and boosted typing output by 150%, according to a monthlong study by Alan Hedge of Cornell. The higher, more comfortable temperature resulted in a savings for the employer of about $2 per worker per hour, Hedge says.

Source: “Cornell News: Office temperature and productivity” via Harvard’s daily stat

Link posted at 5:55 AM (1 year ago) | Permalink

How to deal with life’s distractions from lifehacker, this image is how  most of us feel right? I know I do…
via quotivation

How to deal with life’s distractions from lifehacker, this image is how most of us feel right? I know I do…

via quotivation

Posted at 8:14 PM (1 year ago) | Permalink

I heart infogrpahics - daily pic. Teens and cell phone usage.

I heart infogrpahics - daily pic. Teens and cell phone usage.

Posted at 3:16 PM (2 years ago) | Permalink

Bring cookie monster back Google!

I had never seen this until I came across it amongst someone’s twitpics the other day and had to share it.  For more cookie monster deliciousness check out our recent McSweeney’s post

Bring cookie monster back Google!

I had never seen this until I came across it amongst someone’s twitpics the other day and had to share it. For more cookie monster deliciousness check out our recent McSweeney’s post

Posted at 10:50 PM (2 years ago) | Permalink

» McSweeney's Cookie Monster goes on a freudian analysis (could be misused psych reference but you get my drift) Unless prepared to read this humorous work in Cookie Monster's voice (in your head of course), save for chuckles later on

COOKIE MONSTER SEARCHES DEEP WITHIN HIMSELF AND ASKS: IS ME REALLY MONSTER?

BY ANDY F. BRYAN

McSweeney’s Cookie Monster goes on a freudian analysis (could be misused psych reference but you get my drift) of himself and the monster cookie lover within.  Sesame Street adult-style not only cracked me up (since I read it aloud in my best cookie monster/yoda like voice) and if you like McSweeney’s publications normally, then you’d be fool not read - that’s cookie monster’s grammar, not mine. WARNING: Unless prepared to read in Cookie Monster’s voice (in your head of course), do not proceed - just a recommendation to put it over the humor edge.

Link posted at 4:01 AM (2 years ago) | Permalink

Spoonful of lowfat dressing keeps the nutrients from going down…

In a recent Morning Edition blurb on diet and health, an eye-opening fact help solidify what I’ve been suspecting all along… All these low-fat, fake substitute food stuffs aren’t benefiting us as much as they are inhibiting our bodies ability to process everything from sugar to fat to now… betacarotene.  Here’s a glimpse into the must-read NPR story:

“The salads all tasted the same to me,” says Brown. But when researchers went back and analyzed the blood samples they realized that people who had eaten fat-free or low-fat dressings didn’t absorb the beneficial carotenoids from the salad. Only when they had eaten the oil-based dressing did they get the nutrients.” Read Full NPR Story here…

Posted at 8:10 PM (2 years ago) | Permalink

“According to this year’s Harris Poll Happiness Index, 39% of Americans who earn between $50,000 and $74,999 a year say they are happy, making them the happiest of all income groups. “

See full summary from Harvard Business Review’s Daily Stat.

Posted at 6:50 PM (2 years ago) | Permalink

05/30/2009

(via aaronbruh)
My commentary: Had to reblog this humorous picture from another tumblr user!

(via aaronbruh)

My commentary: Had to reblog this humorous picture from another tumblr user!

Posted at 4:28 AM (2 years ago) | Permalink

» Commute times decrease - HBR's Daily Stat

HarvardBusiness.org’s Daily Stat, providing the current commute info and why it is seeing such drastic declines from years prior.

Link posted at 11:13 PM (3 years ago) | Permalink

Thought checking email wasn’t burning calories? Think again.

clutterbutter:

The list below is from Real Simple Magazine’s Reality Check segment, entitled “Calorie Expenditures that May Surprise You,” by Laura Sutherland.

ACTIVITY-Calories Burned

Thinking Thin = 132

Running your finger around the bottom of a frosted cake = 215 

Fretting about whether or not you turned off the iron = 240

Thumbing through a fitness magazine = 273

Cleaning out your e-mail box = 339

Opening a bottle of wine = 406

Waiting on hold with customer service for 20 minutes = 482

Opening your child’s plastic-wrapped Happy Meal toy = 516

Restraining your had from reaching into the chip bowl = 602

Scooping very cold ice cream = 655

Scooping very cold ice cream while fending off three children = 727

Pacing in front of the pantry door = 826

Organize a dinner party in less than 24 hours = 1071

Juggling seven grocery bags, the mail, and your keys = 1149

Taking off a wet swimsuit = 1500

Posted at 9:13 PM (3 years ago) | Permalink

Webplunger © 2002-2010 by MB